The RWA Investment Stack: Custody, Compliance, and Liquidity Solutions
- Harsim Ranjit Singh
- Apr 17
- 9 min read
April 17th, 2025 | RWA | Crypto | By Harsim Ranjit Singh
Building the Infrastructure for Institutional RWA Investing:
Investing in tokenized real-world assets isn’t just about the assets themselves – it requires a robust “investment stack” to support institutional participation. This stack includes secure custody of digital tokens, compliance layers to meet regulatory requirements, and liquidity solutions to enable trading and exit. Traditional finance is accustomed to a well-oiled machine of custodians, transfer agents, brokers, and exchanges. In the world of RWAs on blockchain, analogous functions must be fulfilled, often in new ways. Let’s break down the key components of the RWA investment stack and how they are being addressed:
1. Custody – Safeguarding Tokenized Assets:
For institutions, asset security is paramount. In TradFi, assets (like stock certificates or bond notes) are held by custodians or central securities depositories. In the token world, ownership is represented by private keys controlling tokens on a blockchain – which introduces cybersecurity and key management risk. No bank or fund wants to risk losing millions because a hardware wallet was mismanaged. Thus, a new generation of institutional digital asset custodians has stepped in to handle RWA token custody. Firms like Anchorage Digital, Coinbase Custody, Fireblocks, and BitGo offer services where they hold and secure tokens on behalf of clients, with insurance and rigorous security (multi-sig, HSMs, etc.). Some, like Anchorage, are regulated qualified custodians (Anchorage is a U.S. federally chartered digital asset bank). A family office or fund manager investing in a tokenized bond, for example, will typically keep those tokens with such a custodian rather than in a personal MetaMask wallet. This mirrors the traditional model (institutional custody with audit trails and insurance) and is often required by law – for instance, U.S. investment advisers must use a “qualified custodian” for client assets.
Additionally, some custodians provide wallet APIs and policy controls – e.g., allowing an institution to set rules: “transfers only allowed to whitelisted addresses,” or requiring 2-of-3 approvals internally for any movement. This greatly reduces operational risk. The importance of custody is exemplified by the likes of Coinbase Custody, which holds billions in tokenized assets for institutions, providing them peace of mind through institutional-grade security and compliance1. In essence, the custody layer in the RWA stack ensures that tokenized assets can be held with the same confidence as traditional assets in a bank vault. As erable (a tokenization platform) noted, some investors prefer third-party custodians with insurance to self-custody their token1.
2. Compliance – KYC/AML and Regulatory Controls:
Unlike pure crypto assets, RWAs often are securities or regulated financial instruments. This means compliance is not optional. The RWA investment stack incorporates compliance at multiple levels: identity verification (KYC/AML), accreditation or investor qualification checks, transfer restrictions to comply with securities laws, and ongoing monitoring for illicit activity. Many tokenized RWA platforms use a model of permissioned tokens – essentially ERC-20 tokens with transfer restrictions coded in (via standards like ERC-1404 or using smart contract whitelists). For example, a tokenized security might only transfer between addresses that have been KYC-approved and are in certain jurisdictions.
Platforms like Securitize, Polymesh, and Tokeny specialize in this compliance layer. Securitize, for instance, runs an end-to-end system where investors sign up, complete KYC/AML, prove accreditation status if needed, and then receive tokens to a wallet address that is tagged as eligible. If they try to send tokens to another address, the system checks if that target address is also whitelisted; if not, the transfer is blocked by the token’s smart contract. This prevents, say, a U.S. Reg D security token from being sent to a non-accredited U.S. investor or to someone in a country where it wasn’t offered. Tokeny’s compliance infrastructure (used in Europe) similarly wraps tokens with Transfer Agent-like control on-chain1.
Furthermore, legal frameworks are integrated. For instance, many token offerings rely on subscription agreements and disclosures delivered electronically – investors often have to digitally sign an agreement (sometimes via a platform like DocuSign or via an on-chain acceptance) before tokens are issued. Those agreements might reference the token smart contract address, tying the legal rights to the tokens explicitly. Some jurisdictions like Luxembourg and Switzerland have updated laws to recognize tokenized securities and allow the token ledger to serve as the official shareholder registrar2. This is a crucial development: it means if compliance conditions are met on-chain, the tokens are the legal proof of ownership, simplifying compliance in the long run.
Additionally, AML (anti-money laundering) monitoring is layered in. Firms like Chainalysis and Elliptic provide transaction monitoring on token movements. If a tokenized asset starts moving in patterns suggestive of illicit activity, alerts can be raised and transfers frozen if needed (depending on the token’s design). This is analogous to how banks file Suspicious Activity Reports for large cash movements – here it’s done via blockchain analytics tied into the platform.
3. Liquidity Solutions – Finding Counterparties and Exits:
One of the big promises of tokenization is improved liquidity for traditionally illiquid assets. However, that liquidity doesn’t materialize by magic – it needs marketplaces and mechanisms to connect buyers and sellers. In the RWA stack, liquidity solutions are an active area of development, including both decentralized exchanges (DEXs) adapted for security tokens and centralized venues that handle digital securities.
Permissioned DEXs and AMMs: Projects like Infinity (by IX Swap) and Smart Market are creating decentralized trading venues specifically for security tokens. IX Swap, for instance, integrates Automated Market Makers (AMMs) and liquidity pools for security token. They essentially create liquidity pools where tokenized securities can be traded against stablecoins or other assets, but only compliant wallets can participate. This marriage of DeFi tech (AMMs) with compliance gating is one approach to provide continuous liquidity. Another example is Uniswap’s deployment on permissioned chains (like the Polygon “Nightfall” chain or Base’s KYC subnet in the future) where only verified participants trade, making it suitable for assets like tokenized bonds. These AMMs can offer price discovery and instant liquidity (subject to pool depth) without needing a traditional order book.
Bulletin Board and OTC Platforms: Many tokenization platforms provide an integrated “secondary marketplace” which is essentially a bulletin board or OTC (over-the-counter) matching service. For example, Securitize Markets and ADDX Exchange allow investors to post offers to buy or sell tokenized shares or bonds, and when matches occur, they facilitate the trade (with compliance checks on both sides). This is similar to how private placements trade in traditional markets (via brokered OTC trades), but accelerated by an online interface and blockchain settlement. InvestaX in Singapore operates a licensed secondary exchange for security tokens, letting investors list their token holdings for sale and matching them with global buyers under Singapore’s regulatory sandbox. Such platforms are critical particularly for assets that don’t have enough continuous trading to justify a full exchange order book – they ensure that if an investor needs an exit, there is a mechanism to find buyers.
Market Making and Lending: Liquidity isn’t just about trading venues; it’s also about tools to enhance it. Market makers are beginning to provide services on digital asset exchanges, quoting buy/sell prices for tokenized assets to tighten spreads. In decentralized contexts, protocols like Skate (an RWA AMM concept) are emerging – one example is an idea to create an AMM for stable-value RWA tokens (like stablecoins and yield tokens) that could serve a similar role as Curve Finance did for stablecoin. Additionally, peer-to-peer lending and repo using tokenized assets can improve liquidity for holders – e.g., if you hold a tokenized bond and need cash, you might borrow stablecoins against it rather than selling, thereby getting liquidity without losing the exposure. We already see this with Aave’s deployment for RWA and Flux Finance as mentioned. This kind of DeFi repo potentially reduces forced selling and improves overall market stability/liquidity.
Asset Tokenization Ecosystem Maps: Industry groups have published ecosystem maps highlighting the interplay of issuers, exchanges, custodians, etc. For example, Tokeny’s Real World Asset Tokenization map shows major players categorized as issuance platforms, DeFi protocols, custodians, and networks – underscoring that liquidity results from all these actors connecting (issuers providing assets, custodians securing them, exchanges enabling trades, DeFi protocols offering yield or leverage). A coordinated ecosystem is forming, and family offices or fund managers diving in often partner with a platform that provides an end-to-end service: token issuance + a built-in secondary market + custody integration.
4. Integrated Platforms vs. Specialization:
It’s interesting to observe two models in the RWA stack: Some platforms try to offer the full stack in one (e.g., a single portal for issuance, custody, trading, settlement – like ADDX or Securitize Markets), while others specialize in one layer and integrate with others. For instance, Polymesh is a blockchain designed specifically for securities, with built-in identity and compliance, but it relies on others to list or use those tokens. Fireblocks specializes in custody and transfer infrastructure, and integrates its tech into exchanges and issuers for secure handling. We are seeing increasing interoperability: a token can be issued on one platform, stored in another’s custody, and traded on a third’s exchange. The RWA stack is becoming modular, which is good for scalability and competition. However, in these early days, sometimes working with a one-stop-shop is simpler for an institution – hence the rise of platforms advertising an end-to-end solution (like “Tokenize, Distribute, and Trade on our platform”).
5. Settlement and Interoperability:
One often overlooked aspect of liquidity is settlement and network interoperability. If one token trades on multiple venues or needs to move across blockchains (for example, between a private chain used by an issuer and a public chain used by a DeFi protocol), robust settlement infrastructure is needed. Solutions include atomic swaps or use of bridging technologies for RWAs. Bridging a security token is tricky because one must ensure the asset isn’t double-counted. Often, instead of trustless bridges, tokenization platforms use a burn-and-mint approach with a centralized validator – e.g., an exchange could “lock” tokens in one environment and reissue equivalent tokens in another for liquidity purposes, maintaining a 1:1 backing. Another solution is standardization: efforts like the InterWork Alliance’s Token Taxonomy and ISO standards for digital asset identification aim to make tokenized assets on different platforms speak a common language, easing movement and listings.
On settlement finality, some traditional post-trade firms (like DTCC or Euroclear) are experimenting with integration – e.g., Euroclear participated in a pilot trading tokenized French bonds and then settling the cash leg via CBDC, showing how traditional financial market infrastructure can adapt to tokenized assets trading, ensuring that when a token trade is executed, the payment happens and records update just like in current markets. These kinds of integrations are part of the liquidity equation – they ensure that large institutions can confidently transact knowing the “plumbing” will reliably complete the transaction and update ownership records.
Conclusion – Assembling the Pieces:
The RWA investment stack is effectively recreating the services of traditional capital markets in a blockchain context. Custody provides the safekeeping (like a bank vault or DTC), compliance provides the rule enforcement (like a regulator and transfer agent combined), and liquidity solutions provide the market (like exchanges and OTC brokers). Each piece is critical: without custody, institutions won’t enter; without compliance, regulators won’t permit it; without liquidity, investors won’t see the point of tokenization. The good news is that as of 2025, all these pieces are falling into place:
Major custodians are in the game (Bank of New York Mellon is piloting crypto custody, Northern Trust invested in bond tokenization firm BondEvalue, etc., showing even TradFi custodians are gearing up).
Compliance tech has proven capable – for instance, in 2022, INX (a regulated platform) conducted a token IPO under SEC approval, distributing security tokens to thousands of KYC’d investors with all legal compliance built in, showcasing that large-scale compliant token offerings are doable.
Liquidity is gradually improving as more participants come and volume grows; we’ve seen tokenized assets that launched in 2019 with virtually no trading finally see active secondary transactions in 2023-24 as the investor base widened.
For a new institutional investor stepping into tokenized RWAs, the path is clearer than ever: they will engage a platform or a set of service providers who handle these stack components largely behind the scenes. A family office might go to, say, a platform like Provenance or Oasis Pro, and that platform will handle onboarding (compliance) and connect to a custodian for them, and offer trading options or connect to a liquidity network. Over time, we expect these services to become even more seamless and perhaps consolidated into user-friendly interfaces.
In summary, the RWA investment stack – custody, compliance, liquidity – is the scaffolding that holds up the whole tokenization edifice. The impressive growth of RWAs on-chain to date would not be possible without the quiet build-out of this infrastructure in parallel. As it continues to strengthen, it will support larger and larger flows of real assets into the blockchain world, with institutions feeling as secure trading a tokenized bond as they do a traditional one. The revolution may be digital, but it’s being built on the solid principles of finance – trust, safety, and liquidity – reimagined for the decentralized era.
Want to dive deeper into the impact of blockchain on supply chain management? Keep following Gravitas Crypto for the latest insights on trends and narratives driving the market.
Our story began with the deep desire to drive tangible, visible, and measurable outcomes for clients. With that as our guiding beacon, we launched Gravitas Consulting.
At Gravitas, we measure success by only one metric: each client’s satisfaction with our ability to drive Outcomes that matter.
Comments