top of page

What Institutional DeFi Infrastructure Needs to Look Like in 2025

  • Writer: Harsim Ranjit Singh
    Harsim Ranjit Singh
  • Dec 8, 2024
  • 5 min read

December 9, 2024 | DeFi | Crypto | By Harsim Ranjit Singh


As institutions deepen their commitment to decentralized finance (DeFi), the infrastructure of DeFi in 2025 must evolve to meet their stringent requirements. Enterprise adoption demands that DeFi platforms offer the same assurances around security, compliance, and performance that institutions expect from traditional financial infrastructure.


Key Characteristics of Institutional-Grade DeFi Infrastructure in 2025

Pillars of Institutional DeFi Infrastructure
Pillars of Institutional DeFi Infrastructure

Permissioned Access & Identity: While permissionless DeFi will remain open, institutions require permissioned environments layered on public blockchains. This means integrating digital identity and KYC frameworks at the protocol level. By 2025, we anticipate widespread adoption of “KYC-enabled DeFi,” where whitelisted wallet addresses (verified by trusted institutions as “trust anchors”1) can interact in segregated liquidity pools. For instance, platforms like Aave Arc have already pioneered permissioned lending pools accessible only to verified institutional participants. Moving forward, additional protocols will likely spin up permissioned instances on public blockchains or institutional Layer-2 (L2) networks, allowing regulated entities to transact securely while still enjoying the transparency and automation benefits of blockchain technology.


Interoperability and Integration: Institutional infrastructure for decentralized finance must seamlessly integrate with both legacy financial systems and multiple blockchains. Standardized APIs and messaging protocols—possibly built upon ISO 20022 or SWIFT standards—will allow banks and asset managers to connect DeFi services directly into existing trading, risk, and reporting systems. SWIFT’s successful 2023 experiments demonstrated its potential as an interoperability layer, transferring token instructions between various blockchains for major banks2 3. By 2025, we anticipate institutional DeFi infrastructure to prominently feature integration middleware like oracles, bridges, and APIs that effectively link centralized finance (CeFi) with DeFi ecosystems. An example is JPMorgan’s Onyx integrating with Polygon for DeFi collateral management4, or custodians integrating directly with DeFi protocols (e.g. Copper’s integration of Lido to let clients stake ETH for yield within a custody platform5).


Scalability & Low Latency: Institutional trading demands high throughput and minimal latency. Historically, public Layer-1 blockchains have faced performance limitations, necessitating advancements in L2 network solutions and high-performance chains. By 2025, dedicated L2 rollups, zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) systems (such as Polygon’s zkEVM), and enterprise-focused sidechains will become commonplace. Institutions will leverage these high-speed blockchain networks, comparable in performance to traditional trading venues. Deutsche Bank acknowledges the importance of "global Layer-1 or interlinking networks" for meeting institutional compliance and scalability needs, underscoring the growing maturity of institutional DeFi6.

How Institutional DeFi Solves Scalability
How Institutional DeFi Solves Scalability

Privacy and Confidentiality: Fully transparent blockchains conflict with institutional requirements for confidentiality7. By 2025, we anticipate institutional DeFi infrastructure will widely adopt privacy-preserving technologies like zero-knowledge proofs and permissioned state enclaves. Examples include zero-knowledge proofs or permissioned state enclaves that hide transaction details (amounts, identities) except to authorized viewers. Projects focusing on enterprise privacy for DeFi, such as Aztec Network or EY’s Nightfall, which enable institutions to transact privately on an L2 while maintaining essential audit trails on public blockchains could become integral. This satisfies confidentiality while still leveraging the security of a public chain. Consortium chains bridging to public DeFi liquidity pools—such as Quorum or Corda networks—will offer privacy layers, allowing institutions secure yet flexible access to decentralized markets.


Robust Security & Risk Management: Institutional-grade infrastructure in 2025 will prioritize robust security at every layer. This includes formally verified smart contracts, rigorous multiple independent code audits, and built-in on-chain circuit breakers to prevent abnormal activities. Infrastructure will conform to operational resilience standards similar to the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)8. Security measures will also include multi-party governance controls for protocol upgrades, ensuring decentralized yet secure management9. The objective is to reach the "five nines" (99.999%) reliability level typical of traditional financial systems, embedding disaster recovery plans and redundancies directly into the blockchain infrastructure.


Custody and Key Management: Custody remains a crucial institutional requirement. By 2025, institutional DeFi will heavily leverage Multi-Party Computation (MPC) custody solutions, distributing key management securely among several parties, eliminating single points of compromise. Advanced custody solutions will incorporate hardware security modules (HSMs), governance workflows, and secure enclaves (SGX), enabling institutions to implement complex approval protocols (multi-signature requirements and policy-based transaction controls). Fireblocks and MetaMask Institutional have set early standards, ensuring secure, compliant, and streamlined access to decentralized finance platforms10.


Liquidity and Market Access: Institutional infrastructure must facilitate efficient liquidity access and price discovery. Aggregation services, similar to prime brokerages, will emerge as central components in institutional DeFi stacks. These aggregators will pool liquidity from multiple DEXs and lending platforms, executing large institutional orders with minimal slippage. For example, 1inch Network’s API is already used by trading firms to split trades across many pools, tapping over $400 billion in cumulative liquidity11. In 2025, institutions will rely on unified interfaces connecting major DeFi protocols, borrowing markets, and centralized finance (CeFi) exchanges, simplifying fragmented liquidity pools and ensuring best execution aligned with traditional financial market standards.

Liquidity & Market Access in Institutional DeFi
Liquidity & Market Access in Institutional DeFi

In summary, 2025’s institutional DeFi infrastructure must integrate the security, scalability, privacy, and compliance strengths of traditional finance while capitalizing on the inherent advantages of blockchain technology. The blend of permissioned and permissionless systems positions financial institutions as gatekeepers and trusted validators within DeFi, offering verified identity services and asset tokenization. The resulting financial ecosystem will leverage blockchain technology for transparency, automation, and instant settlement, significantly enhancing both operational efficiency and risk management capabilities for institutions. The end state is an invisible back-end: retail or corporate clients of a bank might use a familiar app interface, not realizing that behind the scenes, a DeFi protocol on an Ethereum Layer-2 is providing the loan or swap. Achieving this vision demands continued regulatory alignment, technological advancement, and industry collaboration, solidifying DeFi as an indispensable pillar of the future financial landscape.





Want to dive deeper into the impact of blockchain on supply chain management? Keep following Gravitas Crypto for the latest insights on trends and narratives driving the market.


Gravitas Crypto

Our story began with the deep desire to drive tangible, visible, and measurable outcomes for clients. With that as our guiding beacon, we launched Gravitas Consulting.


At Gravitas, we measure success by only one metric: each client’s satisfaction with our ability to drive Outcomes that matter.

Comments


bottom of page