How RWA Protocols Are Solving the Liquidity Puzzle for Traditional Assets
- Harsim Ranjit Singh
- Apr 24
- 9 min read
Updated: Apr 28
April 24th, 2025 | RWA | Crypto | By Harsim Ranjit Singh
The Liquidity Challenge:
Traditionally, many real-world assets have been illiquid – meaning they can’t be easily sold or converted to cash without substantial cost or delay. Examples include commercial real estate, infrastructure projects, loans, private equity stakes, and even certain bonds that trade over-the-counter with low frequency. This illiquidity has long been accepted as the price for higher returns (the “liquidity premium”), but it creates problems: investors get locked in, price discovery is poor, and it’s difficult for smaller investors to participate. Now, RWA protocols are tackling this liquidity puzzle head-on by leveraging blockchain’s always-on global market and novel financial engineering. Here’s how:
1. Fractionalization Increases Potential Buyer Universe:
By breaking a large asset into many smaller fractions (tokens), tokenization dramatically expands the pool of potential buyers and sellers. A $50 million office building might only appeal to a handful of big investors if sold whole, but if it’s tokenized into 50,000 $1,000 tokens, suddenly a much larger number of investors around the world can consider buying a piece. Fractional ownership thus can bring in liquidity from new sources – smaller funds, family offices, even retail accredited investors – who collectively create a market. This democratization of access means at any given time, some subset of these many holders might want to sell and some other subset to buy, leading to more frequent trading. We saw this with tokenized real estate platforms: properties that would typically change hands once a decade have tokens trading every week on secondary platforms. As Ledger Insights noted, fractionalization lowers barriers and “could provide transparency in holdings and supply of all parties, reducing information asymmetry” which helps liquidity1. In essence, more participants = more opportunities for trades.
2. 24/7 Marketplaces Reduce Friction:
Traditional markets for private assets are slow (negotiations, closing periods, etc.) and even public markets have limited hours. RWA protocols enable 24/7 trading on blockchain, so someone in London can buy tokens from someone in Singapore on a Sunday without waiting. This continuous market means liquidity isn’t bottled up by time constraints. It also allows price adjustments in real-time as new information comes (rather than waiting for the next trading window or broker finding a counterparty). For example, after a major news event affecting real estate, token prices on a platform like tZERO or OpenFinance could immediately reflect it, whereas traditional property values might take months to adjust through appraisals and sales. Continuous markets tend to attract arbitrageurs and market makers as well, who provide quotes and narrow spreads since they can trade at any time to manage inventory. Uniswap-style AMMs, as mentioned earlier, can even automate continuous liquidity provision – e.g., an AMM could always stand ready to buy tokens at one price and sell at a slightly higher price, providing instant liquidity to token holders (with the pool earning fees for doing so). Some projects like Balancer or custom AMMs have been used to facilitate trading of RWA tokens (e.g., Tinlake pool tokens) by creating a secondary market in absence of order-book exchanges.
3. Interoperability and Aggregation – Solving Liquidity Silos:
One early issue was fragmentation: assets tokenized on one platform couldn’t easily be traded elsewhere. Efforts are underway to connect these siloed pools of liquidity. Cross-chain bridges and common standards are part of the solution. For instance, AlloyX is an aggregator that lets users get exposure to multiple RWA platforms (Centrifuge, Goldfinch, Maple) through one token, indirectly pooling liquidity. Meanwhile, projects like Cosmos’s upcoming DEX for RWAs or Axelar network bridging aim to allow an asset token on one chain to be mirrored or traded on another chain’s DEX, increasing the potential buyer base. The Medium article by RIVA Markets specifically cites the need for “interoperability solutions to eliminate liquidity islands,” highlighting protocols like Cosmos, Polkadot, and Axelar that enable assets to move across2. By making a token portable, you ensure that if liquidity is better on another marketplace or chain, holders can access it.
Additionally, aggregator exchanges are emerging: imagine a “Kayak.com” for token liquidity that can source bids from multiple platforms. RWA Market (a hypothetical example) could aggregate sell orders from different ATS and DEX venues and show a combined order book to an investor. Some platforms are also exploring API integrations where a broker can tap into a token platform’s liquidity for their clients. Over time, as more venues list these tokens, arbitrage will connect the venues and effectively unify liquidity. A cited solution was having robust cross-ledger settlement so an asset can be listed on two exchanges and still only exist once (solving dual listing). The EU DLT Pilot and projects like Project Genesis by BIS looked at synchronizing settlement for token trades across systems to ensure no fragmentation.
4. Market Making via DeFi Mechanisms:
Liquidity begets liquidity. Recognizing that initial trading might be thin, some RWA protocols incentivize market making. For example, a tokenized real estate platform might allocate a budget to encourage a professional market maker to provide two-way quotes for the first year of trading, narrowing spreads and giving confidence to other traders that they can enter/exit with minimal slippage. On the DeFi side, liquidity mining techniques have been applied carefully to RWA tokens – e.g., Goldfinch early on gave GFI rewards to provide capital (not exactly market making, but to bring lenders in). A future scenario could be a protocol rewarding users who supply both sides of a token pair on a DEX (like a liquidity pool for a bond token and USDC) to boost depth.
That said, RWA protocols understand that sustainable liquidity must come from natural demand, so these incentives are often temporary or small. Another strategy is “lendability” – making tokens usable in DeFi as collateral or in yield strategies. If a token can be deposited in Aave or used in a Yearn vault, that creates an additional avenue to get value from the token beyond just price appreciation, which can draw in more holders and hence more liquidity. For instance, when Aave added real estate tokens (experimentally), holders suddenly could borrow against them, making them more willing to hold knowing they had a liquidity valve if needed (borrow cash instead of selling). This tends to reduce urgent sell pressure and stabilizes the market, paradoxically enhancing liquidity by reducing panic trades.
5. Shortening Settlement Cycles and Automating Compliance:
Often illiquidity in TradFi is as much about procedural delay as lack of buyers. Tokenization tackles this by streamlining settlement – trades that used to take days to officially settle (due to paper processing, notarization, etc.) can settle in minutes on-chain. When settlement risk and delay are minimized, more market participants are willing to trade because the post-trade process is no longer a headache. A private bond trade might require coordinating with custodians and paying a transfer agent, etc. A token transfer just requires a blockchain transaction. This ease encourages volume. Furthermore, automated compliance (discussed above) means you don’t need lengthy bilateral legal negotiations for each trade – the rules are pre-baked, so any whitelisted buyer can buy from any whitelisted seller instantly without extra approvals. By reducing friction, tokens increase liquidity velocity.
Real-World Evidence of Improved Liquidity:
We can point to some metrics and anecdotes indicating progress:
The bid-ask spreads for some tokenized assets have significantly narrowed over time. For example, early on a tokenized REIT on a platform might have had a 5-10% bid-ask spread due to uncertainty. As more data accumulated and more traders joined, spreads shrank to 1-2%, closer to public market levels, showing a healthier market.
Trading volumes on platforms like tZERO or MERJ have been steadily climbing for their listed tokens, albeit from small bases. The increased frequency of trades suggests that initial investors are finding buyers when they want out. For instance, one tokenized commercial real estate offering on tZERO reportedly saw monthly volume equal to ~3-5% of its market cap – which, while not huge, is far better than virtually zero liquidity that direct property ownership would have.
During the 2022 crypto downturn, many DeFi yields dried up, but protocols with RWA exposure maintained consistent activity. This implies real-world borrowers continued to borrow and lenders rolled over loans, providing continuous liquidity flow (in contrast to DeFi pools that simply emptied). This sort of decoupling from crypto market cycles means liquidity from RWA deals can persist even when crypto trading is quiet, keeping those platforms active year-round3.
Challenges in Achieving Liquidity – and Solutions:
It’s not all solved yet. Low liquidity is still a reality for many tokenized assets. Solutions in progress include:
Involving Brokers and Advisors: To bring in more participants, some platforms are partnering with traditional brokers and private banks so that their clients can trade tokens through their existing accounts. For example, a private bank might let its clients buy a tokenized bond through the bank’s interface, and the bank hooks into the token platform’s backend. This adds more buyers without each needing to learn new tech, boosting liquidity.
Education and Transparency: Many potential investors remain cautious because they don’t understand tokenized assets well or worry about trust. RWA protocols are making efforts to provide transparent asset data (e.g., real-time loan performance, occupancy for real estate, etc.). The Medium piece by Roy Villanueva emphasized transparency and reducing information asymmetry to foster trust in RWA liquidity1. As comfort grows, those sitting on the sidelines may step in, adding liquidity.
Regulatory Clarity: In some cases, secondary trading is limited by regulatory lock-up periods (like 1-year lock for Reg D securities in the U.S.). Once those expire, a lot more liquidity can flow as tokens become freely tradable among accredited investors. Also, the SEC and other regulators have been studying tokenized secondary markets – clearer rules (for example, around alternative trading systems for tokens) would likely encourage more trading venues to list tokens, thereby improving liquidity. The EU’s DLT Pilot Regime is explicitly designed to test how to make traditionally illiquid bonds and stocks trade in a tokenized form within regulated markets, aiming to show regulators that it’s beneficial before broad adoption.
Catalysts on the Horizon:
The liquidity puzzle is being solved piece by piece, and there are some catalysts that could accelerate it:
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) or regulated stablecoins could make settlement of token trades even smoother, especially for cross-border transactions. If every token trade could settle in a near-instant, on-chain delivery-versus-payment (DvP) with a CBDC, that removes any remaining friction of on/off ramping between fiat and tokens. Projects like Project Guardian in Singapore demonstrated tokenized bond trading with instant settlement using a tokenized deposit1, significantly reducing the typical settlement time and associated liquidity lock-ups.
Institutional Market Makers entry: Firms like Jump Trading, DRW/Cumberland, etc., have been extremely active in crypto markets. As RWA tokens grow, these sophisticated liquidity providers are likely to devote resources to them – making markets and arbitraging across venues, which will hugely improve liquidity. A sign of this was Jane Street and Hudson River Trading participating in early tokenized treasury pilots, hinting that traditional market makers are eyeing the space.
Network Effects: Liquidity begets liquidity. As the trading volume and user count on certain RWA platforms reach critical mass, they’ll become the go-to venues, which concentrates activity and further boosts liquidity (a positive feedback loop). We might see, say, one platform emerge dominant for tokenized private credit trading; once that happens, everyone will list there, and it becomes “the place” for buyers and sellers to meet, reducing fragmentation.
Conclusion:
Tokenization is chipping away at the liquidity premium by making traditionally illiquid assets more tradeable. It’s bringing the speed and openness of crypto markets to assets that used to sit in filing cabinets or on bespoke ledgers. While not every tokenized asset is liquid yet, the trajectory is clear – each technical and regulatory breakthrough opens the door to more fluid markets. It’s telling that even central bankers and major institutions are now talking about liquidity in the context of tokenized assets. For investors, improved liquidity means lower transaction costs, better price discovery, and more flexibility (you can re-balance or exit when needed). For issuers, it means higher valuations and broader investor reach (liquidity typically reduces the discount investors demand). The “liquidity puzzle” isn’t solved overnight, but piece by piece, RWA protocols are fitting it together: fractionalization, 24/7 markets, interoperability, innovative market making, and streamlined settlement are combining to transform stodgy, slow assets into something much closer to the instant markets we see in crypto. As these trends continue, we expect the gap between liquid public markets and traditionally illiquid private markets to narrow – a world where owning a slice of a skyscraper could eventually be as liquid (or nearly so) as owning shares of Apple. That represents a profound change in finance, potentially unlocking enormous value and efficiency.
Want to dive deeper into the impact of blockchain on supply chain management? Keep following Gravitas Crypto for the latest insights on trends and narratives driving the market.
Our story began with the deep desire to drive tangible, visible, and measurable outcomes for clients. With that as our guiding beacon, we launched Gravitas Consulting.
At Gravitas, we measure success by only one metric: each client’s satisfaction with our ability to drive Outcomes that matter.
Comments